Prevention of Crime Concerns : According The Analyst
Analyst Dr Lynsey Dubbeld of the CCV shall request that the conclusion that “stick approach” does not work, indeed from the report is pulled, but on the basis of a detailed analysis. “The repression” is indeed more to the fore. As concrete examples it cites:

• Container Houses for causing nuisance tenants.
• Damage Story to vandalism or theft during the turn of stores.
• Weekend Package for perpetrators of uitgaansgeweld.
• Street and neighborhood prohibited loitering.
• Travel bans for violent offenders in the OV.
• Hostels for the care of homeless addicts.
• Close to coffee shops and prostitution houses.
• Damage Story to vandalism or theft during the turn of stores.
• Travel bans for violent offenders in the OV.
• Hostels for the care of homeless addicts.
• Close to coffee shops and prostitution houses.

Furthermore, the fine powers of municipalities with extended degradation and pollution. Is there a restraining suspects for domestic violence come. Can new, rapid sentences for hooligans and nuisance offenders under the Act to combat football hooliganism and serious inconvenience imposed. His fast track and fast right ingvoerd to destruction and violence. Also new technology it supports repression under: camera helmets for police officer, cameras in the fight against robbers, canachoppers (mini helicopters of the police) to hemp farms along to identify, Mosquito’s order to expel them loitering. The call for “tough problem youth of Moroccan descent” is unmistakable. And she mentions the idea of drinking on the streets to fight bladder by mandatory testing be introduced for pedestrians.

That the criticism of state repression in the report, but in the press release because the CCV is the target of the report as “not wanted to bother. These are the numerous local authorities mainly struggling with prevention. The national policy should be careful to repression. And with the local prevention. Clockwise or counterclockwise, the ‘controlled’ threatened …